2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1997 Chrysler CCV
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler CCV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler CCV would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler CCV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1997 Chrysler CCV | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | Blenheim | CCV |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4700 cc |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |