2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura CL would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1999 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 160 kg more than 1999 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bristol Blenheim | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | Bristol | Acura |
| Model | Blenheim | CL |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2715 mm |
