2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 555 kg more than 2002 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bristol Blenheim | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | Blenheim | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3270 mm |
