2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 145 kg more than 2002 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Blenheim | Tracker |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2210 mm |