2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2003 Mazda 323

To start off, 2003 Mazda 323 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 235 kg more than 2003 Mazda 323.

Because 2002 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Bristol Blenheim 2003 Mazda 323
Make Bristol Mazda
Model Blenheim 323
Year Released 2002 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5900 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 97 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1395 kg 1160 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1120 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 105 L 55 L