2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2005 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2005 Cadillac SRX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 556 kg more than 2002 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 2005 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | SRX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1951 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 76 L |