2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (351 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore. 2002 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2006 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2006 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Bristol Blenheim | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Bristol | Holden |
Model | Blenheim | Commodore |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |