2002 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 565 kg more than 2002 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2009 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Bristol Blenheim | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Blenheim | SRX |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3562 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 254 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 76 L |
