2002 Buick Cielo vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2002 Buick Cielo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2002 Buick Cielo. (241 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Buick Cielo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 355 kg more than 2002 Buick Cielo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Buick Cielo | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Cielo | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 6638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 241 HP | 339 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1875 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2880 mm |
