2002 Buick Cielo vs. 1964 Ford GT 40

To start off, 2002 Buick Cielo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2002 Buick Cielo. (241 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Buick Cielo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Buick Cielo weights approximately 656 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.

Because 1964 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2002 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40. 2002 Buick Cielo has automatic transmission and 1964 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1964 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Buick Cielo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: