2002 Buick Cielo vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2002 Buick Cielo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2002 Buick Cielo. (241 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2002 Buick Cielo.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Buick Cielo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Buick Cielo (387 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. (300 Nm). This means 2002 Buick Cielo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Buick Cielo | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Cielo | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3800 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 241 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2900 mm |
