2002 Buick Regal vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2002 Buick Regal is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2002 Buick Regal. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2002 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 560 kg more than 2002 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Buick Regal | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Regal | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 79 L |
