2002 Cadillac Catera vs. 1961 Morgan 4
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Catera is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1961 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1961 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1961 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Catera | 1961 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Morgan |
Model | Catera | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2961 cc | 1339 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2450 mm |