2002 Cadillac Catera vs. 1964 DKW F 102
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Catera is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1964 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1964 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 795 kg more than 1964 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 DKW F 102. 2002 Cadillac Catera has automatic transmission and 1964 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1964 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac Catera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Catera | 1964 DKW F 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Catera | F 102 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2961 cc | 1175 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 68 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 31 L |