2002 Cadillac Catera vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Catera is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 855 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Catera | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Catera | 323 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2961 cc | 1071 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2370 mm |