2002 Cadillac Catera vs. 1986 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Catera is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 523 kg more than 1986 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2002 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac Catera | 1986 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | Catera | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2002 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2961 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2630 mm |