2002 Cadillac Catera vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Catera is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan MM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan MM would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2001 Nissan MM. (153 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan MM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Cadillac Catera.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan MM (372 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac Catera. (260 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan MM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac Catera.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac Catera | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | Catera | MM |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2961 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |
