2002 Cadillac Catera vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac Catera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac Catera would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (156 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 225 kg more than 2013 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Cadillac Catera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac Catera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac Catera 2013 Toyota Matrix
Make Cadillac Toyota
Model Catera Matrix
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2961 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 260 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 88 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 96 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic 5-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1705 kg 1480 kg
Vehicle Length 4890 mm 4365 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]