2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Holden FX

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1948 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 648 kg more than 1948 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1948 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1948 Holden FX. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1948 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1948 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: