2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 182 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1949 Talbot Saoutchik has manual transmission. 1949 Talbot Saoutchik will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Talbot Saoutchik | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | CTS | Saoutchik |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 4480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3160 mm |