2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Triumph Renown
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 280 kg more than 1949 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Triumph Renown. (148 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Triumph Renown | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | Renown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2750 mm |