2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1951 Fiat Campagnola

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 310 kg more than 1951 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1951 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac CTS 1951 Fiat Campagnola
Make Cadillac Fiat
Model CTS Campagnola
Year Released 2002 1951
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3179 cc 1901 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 3650 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1950 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2260 mm