2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1951 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 3,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar MK V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Jaguar MK V weights approximately 57 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1951 Jaguar MK V | |
Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
Model | CTS | MK V |
Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2900 mm |