2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1952 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1952 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | A6G |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 550 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2290 mm |