2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1954 Jensen Interceptor
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jensen Interceptor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jensen Interceptor would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jensen Interceptor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1954 Jensen Interceptor. (130 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 Jensen Interceptor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 123 kg more than 1954 Jensen Interceptor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jensen Interceptor. (287 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jensen Interceptor.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1954 Jensen Interceptor | |
Make | Cadillac | Jensen |
Model | CTS | Interceptor |
Year Released | 2002 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 287 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 111.1 mm |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2860 mm |