2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1955 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1955 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1955 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 243 kg more than 1955 Studebaker Champion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1955 Studebaker Champion | |
Make | Cadillac | Studebaker |
Model | CTS | Champion |
Year Released | 2002 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2970 mm |