2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1958 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1958 Simca Aronde. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1958 Simca Aronde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 668 kg more than 1958 Simca Aronde. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Simca Aronde. (108 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Simca Aronde.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1958 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Cadillac | Simca |
Model | CTS | Aronde |
Year Released | 2002 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2450 mm |