2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1961 Renault 4
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1961 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1961 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 968 kg more than 1961 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1961 Renault 4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | 4 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2410 mm |