2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 508 kg more than 1962 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1962 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | CTS | Munga |
Year Released | 2002 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 31 L |