2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 243 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | Crown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2750 mm |