2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 305 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | Crown |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1837 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 22.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |