2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. (91 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 678 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. (134 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Isuzu Bellett | |
Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
Model | CTS | Bellett |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |