2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1971 McLaren M14
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 McLaren M14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 McLaren M14 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 McLaren M14 (420 HP @ 9200 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 McLaren M14 should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1971 McLaren M14 has manual transmission. 1971 McLaren M14 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac CTS | 1971 McLaren M14 | |
| Make | Cadillac | McLaren |
| Model | CTS | M14 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
