2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1974 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1974 Mitsubishi Minica. (33 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Mitsubishi Minica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1148 kg more than 1974 Mitsubishi Minica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mitsubishi Minica. (39 Nm @ 6500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mitsubishi Minica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1974 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Minica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 357 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 39 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2010 mm |