2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1977 Mazda 818
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 618 kg more than 1977 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1977 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 818 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2320 mm |