2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 378 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2640 mm |