2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Fiat 127
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat 127 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1981 Fiat 127. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 855 kg more than 1981 Fiat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Fiat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat 127. (65 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Fiat 127 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | 127 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 65 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 67.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2230 mm |