2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Citroen GS
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 693 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Citroen GS | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | GS |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1128 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 43 L |