2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Ferrari 126
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ferrari 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ferrari 126 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ferrari 126 (573 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ferrari 126 should accelerate faster than 2002 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1028 kg more than 1982 Ferrari 126.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1982 Ferrari 126 has manual transmission. 1982 Ferrari 126 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Ferrari 126 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | CTS | 126 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 573 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 11000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2660 mm |