2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1983 Audi 4000
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1983 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | CTS | 4000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2550 mm |