2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1983 Pontiac Firebird

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1983 Pontiac Firebird. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Pontiac Firebird.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Pontiac Firebird. (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Pontiac Firebird.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac CTS 1983 Pontiac Firebird
Make Cadillac Pontiac
Model CTS Firebird
Year Released 2002 1983
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3179 cc 2827 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 134 HP
Torque 296 Nm 223 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 88.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 75.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 60 L