2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1985 MG EX-E
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 MG EX-E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 MG EX-E would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1985 MG EX-E is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 MG EX-E will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1985 MG EX-E has automatic transmission and 2002 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2002 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 MG EX-E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1985 MG EX-E | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | CTS | EX-E |
Year Released | 2002 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |