2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Rover 100
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 748 kg more than 1992 Rover 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100. (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Rover 100 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | CTS | 100 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |