2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1995 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1995 Ford Windstar. (155 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Windstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Windstar weights approximately 72 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Windstar. (220 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Windstar.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1995 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Windstar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1920 mm |