2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Buick Century
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Century would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1996 Buick Century. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Century.
Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Buick Century. (180 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Buick Century | |
Make | Cadillac | Buick |
Model | CTS | Century |
Year Released | 2002 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2664 mm |