2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1997 Ford Contour

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Contour would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1997 Ford Contour. (200 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Contour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 170 kg more than 1997 Ford Contour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Contour. (231 Nm @ 5625 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Contour.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Cadillac CTS 1997 Ford Contour
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Contour
Year Released 2002 1997
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3179 cc 2544 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 210 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6700 RPM
Torque 296 Nm 231 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5625 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L