2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Kia Avella
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Avella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Avella would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1998 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 703 kg more than 1998 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Avella. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Avella.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1998 Kia Avella | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | CTS | Avella |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2400 mm |