2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Lada Natacha

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lada Natacha. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lada Natacha would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1998 Lada Natacha. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 Lada Natacha. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 633 kg more than 1998 Lada Natacha. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Lada Natacha, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lada Natacha. (118 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lada Natacha. 2002 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1998 Lada Natacha has manual transmission. 1998 Lada Natacha will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: