2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1998 Mazda MS-9
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda MS-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda MS-9 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda MS-9 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1998 Mazda MS-9 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | MS-9 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |