2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Oldsmobile LSS

To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Oldsmobile LSS would be higher. At 3,784 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Oldsmobile LSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. (202 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 30 kg more than 1999 Oldsmobile LSS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Oldsmobile LSS (312 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac CTS. (296 Nm). This means 1999 Oldsmobile LSS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications: